Inflation figures are even worse than the free market economists think
Posted by A.B. Dada on 23rd July 2008
Chicago, IL
By A.B. Dada
—
To free market economists, such as myself, the term inflation means one thing: the increasing of the money supply. In simple terms, this means creating more money than was previously in existence. Inflation has a primary side effect: the increasing of prices. It has another side effect: malinvestments, which mean that investors see increasing prices in a market, so they put more money into that market, causing prices to skyrocket. This is how bubbles are created, usually put at the fault of the central bank that created all the new money. The third effect of inflation is the boom-and-bust economic cycle.
When most “normal” non-economist people talk of inflation, they mean one thing: the rise in prices. Fuel prices are up double in one year; housing prices skyrocketed 100% to even 300% in some markets in 4 years. People call that inflation, even though it is an effect of inflation, or the creation of new money.
When people speak of this simple definition of inflation, they talk of figures: 5% a year, or 10% a year, or the government’s imaginary figure called CPI of 3.1% or so. Even free market economists look at the price rises and judge them based on a percentage year over year. They’re all wrong. Price increases, the effect of inflation, is even worse.
In a market with a fixed money supply, say gold (but it could be a fixed supply of dollars, or euros, or nails or dirt, too), there’s an interesting side effect in a productive market: prices tend to fall softly over time. This is called deflation, but in fact it is just prices dropping.
When you have a fixed amount of money in an economy, and an increasing supply of goods, more goods chasing the same fixed amount of money mean that prices will fall over time. Your money, over time, becomes more valuable. This is a good thing as it instills a desire to save money rather than spend it frivolously. It means that the poor can save money to become wealthier in the future, and the wealthy who spend it frivolously can lose their wealth quickly in an economy where the money becomes more valuable by just sitting in a bank or under the mattress.
In a fixed money economy, prices tend to fall over time. In an inflationary economy, prices tend to rise over time. We generally look at just the rise in prices year over year, but we ignore the reality that those prices would actually fall, so the true price of inflation is the percentage increase over a year minus the expected decrease of prices in a fixed economy.
Let’s say you have just $100 in an economy, and that doesn’t change. There are 10 apples for sale. People are willing to pay $4 per apple. Now, a new product, oranges is released, and there are 20 oranges. They’re good, maybe better than apples, but they’re in plentiful supply. Because the money supply is fixed at $100, the same money chases both apples and oranges. People are unwilling to pay $4 for apples since a new choice is on the scene: maybe apples fall in value to $3 a piece. That’s a 33% decrease over a period of time in prices.
Now let’s say that you have a central bank that increases the money supply. Maybe they’ll add $10 to the economy. With $110 in the same economy, it is possible that apples would rise in price to $4.40, or an “inflation” figure of 10%. So the experts will say “Look, inflation is 10%!” But they’re ignoring the growth of new products to compete with those apples. Once oranges are introduced, the amount of money being grown to $110, prices might rise, but in reality they’ll fall because of the new supply of goods. Apples might fall to $3.30, which is a larger fall than we’d see in a non-inflationary economy ($1.10) but leaves us with a price higher than in a non-inflationary economy ($3.00). In the end, the apple that would normally fall to $3.00 only fell to $3.30, from $4.00 nominal pricing, which means that the figure normally quoted for inflation can be quite a bit higher.
While it is impossible to gauge what items or markets will increase in price during a period of monetary inflation, we should realize that prices in a stable currency market generally softly fall, as long as there is no surge in demand or drop in supplies. When you factor this “soft deflation” of prices in a fixed-currency economy, you can realize that even the most aggressive inflation figure estimated by free market economists is still off.
Posted in Uncategorized, Inflation, Federal Reserve | No Comments »